<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a day without sunshine</title>
	<link>http://lair.fierydragon.org/2007/06/a-day-without-sunshine/</link>
	<description>Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Lair / still no sunshine</title>
		<link>http://lair.fierydragon.org/2007/06/a-day-without-sunshine/#comment-9654</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lair / still no sunshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lair.fierydragon.org/2007/06/a-day-without-sunshine/#comment-9654</guid>
		<description>[...] a couple of days ago - I decided that I would try out the day without Google. Well, the challenge was specifically a day without the 5 major search engines, but in my case - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a couple of days ago - I decided that I would try out the day without Google. Well, the challenge was specifically a day without the 5 major search engines, but in my case - [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Yellow</title>
		<link>http://lair.fierydragon.org/2007/06/a-day-without-sunshine/#comment-9389</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Yellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lair.fierydragon.org/2007/06/a-day-without-sunshine/#comment-9389</guid>
		<description>Let me rephrase that.

Watching F1 is boring. Watching Rossi is awesome.

Conspiracy be damned, we'll all be cycling in 50 years anyway!

Gots ma Wimbledon tickets, hopefully I'll finally get to see one of the top 2!

Picking the number of sets is not difficult, there's a 1/3 chance of getting it right, but which sets and the margin is where it's at dawg. But thanks anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me rephrase that.</p>
<p>Watching F1 is boring. Watching Rossi is awesome.</p>
<p>Conspiracy be damned, we&#8217;ll all be cycling in 50 years anyway!</p>
<p>Gots ma Wimbledon tickets, hopefully I&#8217;ll finally get to see one of the top 2!</p>
<p>Picking the number of sets is not difficult, there&#8217;s a 1/3 chance of getting it right, but which sets and the margin is where it&#8217;s at dawg. But thanks anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drac</title>
		<link>http://lair.fierydragon.org/2007/06/a-day-without-sunshine/#comment-9300</link>
		<dc:creator>drac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lair.fierydragon.org/2007/06/a-day-without-sunshine/#comment-9300</guid>
		<description>actually, that's my tortured sentence syntax kicking in. 

Rephrased, the 50-50 chance of predicting the winner wasn't too hard. Nadal looked good throughout the tournament and I suppose I suspected he'd win it too.

Picking the number of sets for the win was, on the other hand, an excellent feat :)

Kept wondering why he didn't use the sliced backhand (the commentators picked up on it, to be fair). Every time he tried it, Nadal had to resort to sidespin or just popping the ball up and Feds got the point. All too often though, Feds was just tossing the ball over and telling Nads to whack it back with topspin.

Wimbledon actually might work for Nads if the grass is slower this year. You'd think. In ol Fed's defence though, he's been going through a mini coaching crisis and he looked horribly off (45+ unforced errors?!) in the final.

Dude. Eff one is better this year than it has been in many a year. Schumi is out, Alonso is throwing a hissy fit at the "English" conspiracy at MacLaren, Ferrari are out on their ass for once, Massa is doing better than Kimi. There's a lot more drama. I'm still wondering if the boy Hamilton is being built up for a fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, that&#8217;s my tortured sentence syntax kicking in. </p>
<p>Rephrased, the 50-50 chance of predicting the winner wasn&#8217;t too hard. Nadal looked good throughout the tournament and I suppose I suspected he&#8217;d win it too.</p>
<p>Picking the number of sets for the win was, on the other hand, an excellent feat <img src='http://lair.fierydragon.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Kept wondering why he didn&#8217;t use the sliced backhand (the commentators picked up on it, to be fair). Every time he tried it, Nadal had to resort to sidespin or just popping the ball up and Feds got the point. All too often though, Feds was just tossing the ball over and telling Nads to whack it back with topspin.</p>
<p>Wimbledon actually might work for Nads if the grass is slower this year. You&#8217;d think. In ol Fed&#8217;s defence though, he&#8217;s been going through a mini coaching crisis and he looked horribly off (45+ unforced errors?!) in the final.</p>
<p>Dude. Eff one is better this year than it has been in many a year. Schumi is out, Alonso is throwing a hissy fit at the &#8220;English&#8221; conspiracy at MacLaren, Ferrari are out on their ass for once, Massa is doing better than Kimi. There&#8217;s a lot more drama. I&#8217;m still wondering if the boy Hamilton is being built up for a fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Yellow</title>
		<link>http://lair.fierydragon.org/2007/06/a-day-without-sunshine/#comment-9293</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Yellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lair.fierydragon.org/2007/06/a-day-without-sunshine/#comment-9293</guid>
		<description>Why thank you!

50-50 chance, but it's not what you call, but how you call it. Nadal in four, though I thought Federer would take the 1st set comfortably like he did last year and then crumble. He held up a bit more this year and his backhand didn't look as vulnerable, but what's scary is how much Nadal's shotmaking has improved. Federer has gotten better since last year, but not as much as Nadal has. Add his serve and his improved groundstrokes and Wimbledon may not be as out of reach for him as people think!

F1 however is still supremely boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why thank you!</p>
<p>50-50 chance, but it&#8217;s not what you call, but how you call it. Nadal in four, though I thought Federer would take the 1st set comfortably like he did last year and then crumble. He held up a bit more this year and his backhand didn&#8217;t look as vulnerable, but what&#8217;s scary is how much Nadal&#8217;s shotmaking has improved. Federer has gotten better since last year, but not as much as Nadal has. Add his serve and his improved groundstrokes and Wimbledon may not be as out of reach for him as people think!</p>
<p>F1 however is still supremely boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
